To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Others think they have a much easier life than their parents did. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some centuries ago, people used to have a major concern on acquiring an enormous amount of food for their survival.
Nevertheless, this issue has been solved in 21st century, and individuals have a heap of aims to grab. Certain people have concluded that present generation is much more lucky enough to experiences an easy life in comparision to the residents a decade ago.
However, In my opinion, citizenries are facing more harsh condition in present world than people in primitive years.
Certainly, although nowadays, the technologies have changed the lifestyles of people, these are equally intensifying a probability of horrid criminal environment.
It means, it is fairly surging the rate of more crimes and less trust which eventually eradicating the level of a safety in a society or either overall in the whole world. Does such situation makes a life easier?
I think probably not, it even upgrades a sense of violence, quarrel and no identity of peace. Also, due to an advancement in medical science, citizenries are fortunate to live a more lives.
It is to say that, more elderly population lead to a lack of food supply equally in every corner of the world. Another, people, nowadays, have to pay a thick money to consume their basic needs.
Furthermore, although young generations are far moe educated, the package of tension is underlying factor which frustruated them massively. Moreover, the chancces to grant an employment is improbable for people, even they are well-qualified and graduated from a famous university.
To be more specific, individuals in past, who completed their 10th standard used to get more priorities, and also an opportunity to be a part of high post in a job.
For instance, people who have professional belongings are only favourable in 21st century. Thence, a life of young people is more unadorned in present days. In conclusion, Sompe people have been stated that life is better in current than those in past. But, I hold the opposite opinion, as it is more captious to survive in the recent world.
I strongly recommend that government must be deemed on such situation and provide job facilities to young leaders. Also citizenries must develop a feeling of comradery, which will makes a life more safe and easy.Nov 20, · Re: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so prote Post by ashok4ielts» Fri Nov 07, pm Wild animals have no place in the .
Hunting has been caused many species no longer exist and endangered. For example, the last individual Asian one-horn rhino was found death in Nam Cat Tien, Vietnam.
Furthermore, humans have been expanding their places for living, farming and other purposes. Living places for wild animals has become smaller than ever.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ( Words, 13 Sentences, 4 Paragraphs, Band 9). Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? đã hỏi 17 Tháng 11, trong Opinion bởi ntchung (0 điểm). Nov 20, · Re: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so prote Post by ashok4ielts» Fri Nov 07, pm Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is .
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste IELTS FEVER practice tests for ielts free of cost.